A case of low urine creatinine
| HOSP # | WARD | Sample from porphyria laboratory | |
| CONSULTANT | Dr. Heleen Vreede | DOB/AGE | 29y Female |
Abnormal Result

Presenting Complaint
Upon signing blood results out, a creatinine result was measured by the analyzer as <0.1 mmol/L on a urine sample.
History
Clinical History was not available, but in my personal experience at the time, I haven’t seen such a low urine creatinine yet.
The possibilities in my mind, was that this was either a serum sample and could perhaps be incorrectly sent / registered from the Porphyria lab as serum, hence the result being < 0.1 mmol/L (<100umol/L if translated into serum reporting units).
Examination
The sample smelt and looked like urine. According to our new registrar, Mrs. Mariam Mahomed, it also tasted like urine. I was personally not capable of this task, so we decided to rerun the sample.
Mrs. Bilqees Jacobs, our technologist on the bench this day was of opinion that when such a low result is seen, it is usually due to a bubble aspirated by the analyzer’s sampling probe.
Laboratory Investigations

The rerun of the sample as a urine creatinine gave the result as 1.9 mmol/L, more in keeping with a true urine creatinine result.
Other Investigations
None was necessary, but should the result have been < 0.1 mmol/L on the rerun, we would then have run the sample as a serum on the analyzer to more accurately quantify the value.
Final Diagnosis
Possibly, a bubble was aspirated by the analyzer’s sampling probe and hence it did not pipette enough sample into the reagent well, or likely not pipette any sample therein.
Take Home Messages
Try to avoid bubbles in samples.
This brings me to the point: whenever a ” lower than detection limit” is seen, think of the cause:
“Tiny Bubbles!”