Falsely decreased glucose

HOSP # WARD Antenatal Clinic
CONSULTANT   Dr Heleen Vreede DOB/AGE 30y Female

Abnormal Result

Glucose of < 0.1 mmol/L in a healthy individual being compos mentis.

Presenting Complaint

The patient is following up for routine check-up concerning possible hyperglycemia.

History

The mother is a known diabetic on treatment.

Examination

N/A

Laboratory Investigations

Glucose at 11h00 <0.1 mmol/L
Glucose at 14h00 1.5 mmol/L
Glucose at 20h00 2.6 mmol/L
Glucose at 06h00 (next morning – the day on which bloods were sent to the laboratory) 6.2 mmol/L
Index results at current visit obtained from glucose spead

Other Investigations

Glucose at 11h00 0.8 mmol/L
Glucose at 14h00 2.6 mmol/L
Glucose at 20h00 2.1 mmol/L
Glucose at 06h00 (next morning – the day on which bloods were sent to the laboratory) 5.7 mmol/L
Previous glucose spread in November 2020

The condition of the collection tubes were confirmed. All were taken in the correct collection tubes (Sodium Fluoride tubes) and appears to be correctly labelled.

Fig. 1 – The blood collection tubes of this patient.

Final Diagnosis

Fig. 2 – Empty pre-filled Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Microtainer blood collection tube – external view.
Fig. 3 – Empty pre-filled Sodium Fluoride (NaF_) Microtainer blood collection tube – internal view.

The conclusion from above findings are the following:

  1. Not enough NaF was present in the sample to adequately inhibit glycolysis, enabling a falsely decreased glucose reading in the older samples (>12 hours old).
  2. The patient wasn’t aware that the powder should stay in the tube when blood is collected, hence discarded the powder before taking her capillary blood samples.

Take Home Message

  • Microtainer (R) specimen containers can be identified without the caps by the colour of the writing on the outside of the tube (in this case grey – the same colour as the cap).
  • The presence of the correct collection tube does not equal the presence of the additive.
  • Attention to detail is necessary to solve cause and effect in some cases.
  • In this case the nursing staff in the Antenatal clinic was informed about the powder in the collection tubes which should not be discarded. The nurse whom I spoke to was completely unaware that the powder in the collection tube served any function.
  • Glucose measurement from capillary blood samples, as in this case, can likely be inaccurate due to many possible pre-analytical (or analytical) reasons. It is however still likely a valid alternative to a resource-constrained setting, especially in South Africa, where patients cannot afford their own glucometers or where there are shortages of handheld glucometers, or more importantly, glucose measuring sticks (or cartridges).



A falsely normal OGTT result?

HOSP # WARD Vanguard Antenatal Clinic
CONSULTANT   Jody Rusch DOB/AGE 32 y Female

Abnormal Result

Oral glucose tolerance test with the Sodium Fluoride (NaF) tubes registered by the lab 20 hours after being sampled.

Collection date: 07h22 05/03/2020

Received date: 18h44, 05/03/2020

Registered date: 03h26, 06/03/2020

Please note that samples in our lab are being centrifuged after being registered.

Fasting Glucose 3.9 mmol/L
120 min. Glucose 4.4 mmol/L

Presenting Complaint

My thoughts were, that if the sample isn’t centrifuged in a timely manner, metabolism would still happen, albeit at a slower rate. I also thought that metabolism (glycolysis) would continue if left for a long period (>8 hours) uncentrifuged.

Would you argue the result as given below at “Laboratory Investigations” is reliable, given the following info?

  1. Stability of glucose in whole blood in NaF tubes?
  2. Could this be a false normal result?

The stability spreadsheet as summarized by our lab did not have the stability info for glucose in whole blood:

Figure 1: Stability spreadsheet as summarized by our lab did not have the stability info for glucose in whole blood.

History

Patient is most likely pregnant (being from an antenatal clinic) and this is then a screening test for gestational diabetes.

Examination

N/A

Laboratory Investigations

Other Investigations

Literature search on Google Scholar yielded the following interesting article:

Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood.

A Y ChanR SwaminathanC S CockramClinical Chemistry, Volume 35, Issue 2, 1 February 1989, Pages 315–317, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/35.2.315 Published: 01 February 1989

Abstract

How effective is sodium fluoride as a preservative of blood glucose? We compared changes in glucose concentration in fluoride-treated blood specimens with those of heparin-treated specimens. The former declined rapidly during the first hour; thereafter the rate of decrease was slower, and after 4 h the glucose concentration in the blood samples remained stable for up to three days. In contrast, the glucose concentration in the heparin-containing samples declined continuously. During the first hour, however, the rates of decline in the two types of samples were similar. Evidently sodium fluoride takes effect slowly but effectively in preserving glucose in blood for at least three days. Its use, however, is unnecessary if the concentration of glucose is to be measured within the first hour after sampling.

Final Diagnosis

This is likely a true result, meaning the patient is normal and does not have impaired glucose tolerance, nor diabetes.

Take Home Message

Blood glucose is stable for 3 days in plasma from NaF tubes, whether being centrifuged in a timely manner or not.

The stability of glucose in specimens is affected by storage temperature, bacterial contamination, and glycolysis. Plasma or serum samples without preservative (NaF) should be separated from cells or clot within half an hour of being drawn. When blood is permitted to clot and to stand uncentrifuged at room temperature, the average decrease in serum glucose is ~7% per hour (0.28 – 0.56 mmol/L/hour), as a result of glycolysis. Glycolysis can be inhibited by collecting the specimen influoride tubes (1).

(1) Sacks DB. Carbohydrates. In: Tietz NW, ed. Fundamentals of Clincal Chemistry. 4th ed. Philadephia: WB Saunders 1996;351-374.